With the rapidly increasing availability of Internet access throughout the globe, and the surge in the number of travellers toting smartphones, tablets, and netbooks, the market for guidebooks would appear to be only narrowing with time. Certainly, when it comes to recency of information, you can not compare the freshness of an online post from hours ago with the stale data contained in a book that, even if only published this year, contains information from possibly several years ago. Even putting recency to one side, who in their right mind would choose to lug a couple of kilograms of guidebooks around in their luggage if they had the option of storing that very same data electronically? Trying to determine your whereabouts in a strange city via street signs and a guidebook map seems positively quaint when your smartphone's GPS/accelerometer/compass combination can show you exactly where you are with little chance of error.
Guidebook sales are perhaps a more concrete indication that the physical guidebook is on the decline. The average guidebook will shift 1,000-2,000 copies per year, and that number has been dropping significant percentages every year for the last few years. Even a very popular guidebook will struggle to sell 10,000 copies per year. It would appear that travellers are rapidly losing both the need and the desire for physical guidebooks.
My own travels have involved dozens of guidebooks which now take up two tightly-packed shelves in my bookcase, and I would not want to embark on any future trip without a guidebook in my shoulder-bag. Here are my reasons why, in no particular order and given with the caveat that I realise that some of them are personal rather than necessarily objective:
- Comfort - in common with many, I don't like reading from a screen for extended periods. I also like to be able to flick back and forth between pages that may not be adjacent, which is easy to do with a physical book but less so if you are having to scroll on an electronic device - this problem is exacerbated with small-screened devices. In addition, there are times when I want to view several consecutive paragraphs, or a map, at the same time, which may not be possible with a small-screened device (unless I choose a minuscule font).
- Low maintenance - a book requires no battery power and no Internet access, and can cope fairly well with most conditions such as rain, dust, etc. In fact, a bit of poor treatment will give character to it - the same can't be said of most electronic devices.
- Extendable - I can scribble hints, recommendations, new information, e-mail addresses, etc all over my guidebook, which may not be possible with electronic data.
- Memento - a guidebook, especially when "enhanced" with the above-mentioned scribblings, and with the creases, foxing, and grime acquired from constant page-thumbing, can induce the recollection of a whole host of memories once the journey has been completed.
- Safety - pulling out a guidebook or an electronic device in the middle of a crowded street will mark you out as a tourist, which can increase your chances of being mugged/robbed/pickpocketed, depending on where you are (though most of my travels have been conducted in countries where my physical appearance and clothes gave me away anyway), and hence is not advisable. However those chances are increased more if what you have in your hand is a tempting gizmo rather than a battered book.
- Conversation starter - having your nose in an electronic device tells those around you nothing about what you're doing on it, and as such may be a barrier to them initiating a conversation with you. If you're flicking through a guidebook, though, it's pretty obvious what you're up to, and that may be a convenient "in" for them.
- Cost - physical books are generally cheaper than their electronic equivalents, especially in the second-hand market. (I should note here that Google Books can be a very useful resource - though the latest editions of guidebooks may only have a limited viewing capability on it, or none at all, older editions may be viewable in their entirety.)
- (Some) information - one obvious flaw of physical guidebooks is that the information contained within them is often years old, which is especially detrimental with regard to accommodation, restaurants, bars and other changeable aspects of travel. However much of the historical and geographical information will still be correct, and that by itself can be worth having.
I should add that my travelling style would probably fit into the category of "flashpacker", i.e. I generally try to keep to a low budget by avoiding 5 star hotels and expensive restaurants but I have the financial capacity for a splurge every now and then. Where possible, I try to travel overland by public bus or train, partly to save money, partly because I have the time, but mainly because that way of travel is more likely to bring me into contact with local people.
Visit any bookstore, or look on Amazon, and you will find guidebooks produced by a variety of companies. Habitual browsers of the Travel section will know of Lonely Planet, Rough Guide, Bradt, Frommer's, Fodor's, Footprint, Rick Steves, Moon, DK Eyewitness, Discovery, Trailblazer, Berlitz, AA, Time Out, BUG, etc etc. Each of these companies is attempting to cover one or more niches in the travel demographic. I have not used products by all of these companies, but I would like to give some opinions, both general and specific, based on my own travelling experiences. It will be pretty obvious which companies I like/dislike, but that is in the context of all things being equal - if I have to choose between a recent publication from a "poor" company rather than a decade-old one from a "good" company, I will choose the recent one.
[Full disclosure: if you click through to Amazon from any of these links and buy the book, I will make a small percentage - though obviously it won't cost you any more. If you don't think my information deserves that small perk, then simply open another tab, go to Amazon and search for the book title!]
Lonely Planet
I spent roughly four years travelling through India, Australia, Southeast Asia, China, Russia, South America, and Africa, seeing or meeting hundreds of other travellers in that time. It is no exaggeration to say that 95% of the guidebooks I saw being wielded were from the Lonely Planet
I will confess that I am not a fan of the Lonely Planet series, and will only reluctantly use their books. One reason is due to their overwhelming popularity. Any establishment listed in the Lonely Planet will immediately become swamped with visitors, which not only means that availability can be an issue, but also that there will be a temptation on the part of the owners to lower standards and hike prices. A second reason is that their emphasis on budget travel tends to attract, not surprisingly, young people - though I do not consider myself old as a mere cough*fortysomething*cough, I'm not particularly looking for that young a crowd to hang out with. Thirdly, the writing style of their titles tends to be a little on the quirky side, and not - in my opinion - in a good way. And finally, I have a slight personal grudge against them. Other guidebook series will send you a free title if you submit a decent selection of corrections and suggestions, however the company to who I submitted the most - a laundry list of over 300 items - and received merely a tepid thank you in return was ... Lonely Planet. They also requested that next time I wished to do something similar, I should make an individual submission for every item - which would obviously be a great use of my time for hundreds of items.
Lonely Planet does, however, score highly on maps. Maps are one of the most useful aspects of any guidebook, simply because they can be used as a canvas on which to add information relating to any logistical parts of travel, e.g. the location of guesthouses, where buses depart from, etc. The map for a particular town/city/site can also be ripped out of the book and taken with you as you explore, which is a lighter and less obtrusive alternative to taking the entire book (the rest of which can be left in your room). Of all the guidebook series, Lonely Planet consistently provides the most map fodder (though see the Trailblazer section for one brilliant exception to this).
The Lonely Planet series is one of the largest out there, which means it contains some titles that cover regions not available in any other series. This was how I came to use the Lonely Planet Africa
Rough Guide
I'm a big fan of the Rough Guide
My first Rough Guide usage for my round-the-world trip was in the inspiration phase, when I also had plenty of trepidation due to having never done any independent travel before. I picked up the Rough Guide to First-Time Around The World
I used 5 Rough Guides on my RTW trip, starting with the Rough Guide to India
I also received a great deal of inspiration from the Eyewitness India guidebook, which I will cover in the Eyewitness section.
The next Rough Guide to make its way into my sweaty mitts was the Rough Guide to Australia, which accompanied me on a total of 6 months travelling around Oz. Australia is comfortably one of the best set-up countries in the world for backpackers, and if you travel there then you'll soon find out why - there are thousands of the b*ggers! Misanthropy aside, the most fun I had in all my travels was during that period in Australia, due to the sheer number of people that I met. There is so much information available everywhere about things to see and do that you could easily get by without using any guidebook at all.
As with India, I was tremendously inspired by the Eyewitness Australia guidebook, which I will cover in the Eyewitness section. I also took the BUG guide to Australia, which will be mentioned in the "Other guides" section at the end of this post.
Southeast Asia was then negotiated with a copy of the Rough Guide to Southeast Asia
I also frequently referred to a Trailblazer title carried by one of my travelling companions, but I will discuss that in the Trailblazer section. I bought an excellent guide to Angkor when I was in Siem Reap, which I will mention in the "Other guides" section. I should also add that Travelfish is an excellent website for travellers in Southeast Asia - the accommodation section in particular is very comprehensive.
Many Southeast Asia travellers will end up in China at some point, which is not covered in either of these books (though they do cover Macau and Hong Kong - these obviously belong to China, but they have different visa requirements to the mainland, in particular many nationalities (e.g. the British) don't need a visa to visit them). China has some parallels with India in that it is a vast country with an enormous population, to the point where its individual provinces can more resemble separate countries, hence it needs its own guidebook.
I picked up my copy of the Rough Guide to China
Interestingly, when I was coming into China from Vietnam, I received a lot of hassle from a customs guy because this guide seems to be on their blacklist - it doesn't contain a section on Taiwan, which is viewed as implying that Taiwan is not a part of China! I had to be quite firm with him that that was not the intention, as he seemed hell-bent on confiscating the book. I didn't have this problem when entering China from Macau, but it's worth noting just in case.
On the web, China Backpacker was a useful site.
From China, I travelled via Mongolia and Russia through to Moscow, for which I used the Trailblazer Trans-Siberian Handbook, which I will cover in the Trailblazer section.
Next up on my travels was South America, for which I used the Rough Guide To South America
I only travelled in Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia (my few hours to see the Brazilian side of Iguazu don't count), and in the main tourist destinations there was no shortage of decent information from hostels and tourist information offices. However I was glad of the guidebook when I was slightly off the tourist trail, as sometimes there was no other source of information, or I simply could not understand the Spanish that helpful people were addressing to me!
Eyewitness (published by Dorling Kindersley)
The Eyewitness
As pre-trip inspiration, though, they are unparalleled. Their main selling point is the dozens of detailed, 3D drawings of sites within the particular country of interest, which no other guidebooks offer. (This also adds to their weight - another reason you probably wouldn't choose to travel with one.) I certainly found that the Eyewitness India
Trailblazer
I've been really impressed by the couple of Trailblazer
The other title in the range that I used was the Trans-Siberian Handbook
Bradt
I don't actually own ANY of the Bradt
Other guides
I took the BUG guide to Australia with me but it is pretty much just a list of hostels and ratings - you'll find much more recent information on the web, not to mention from other travellers, so it's not worth bothering with, especially as Internet access is readily available all over Australia.
Not so much a guidebook, more a reference work, Ancient Angkor
I have used a few other guides in the past, but they were all in the context of holidays where I went to one place and stayed in one hotel, rather than for a period of independent travel, so I won't be mentioning them here. The thing to remember with ANY guidebook though is that it should be complementing your trip, not dictating it.
No comments:
Post a Comment